Are you publishing in a proper journal?

This is a guest post by Vrushali Dandawate, DOAJ Ambassador, India.

e94682_9a907cbaff8a48f383b420a87f9d45da-mv2.jpg_srz_138_207_85_22_0.50_1.20_0

 

All over the world researchers are spending their time in writing research papers, and everyone wants his or her work to be widely recognised. Most of the time researchers are in a hurry to  publish their research papers, so they may not pay attention to whether they are publishing in a proper journal. Unintentionally many researchers are submitting their research papers to questionable  journals (also known as predatory journals).

1. You may get spam emails or marketing materials from the editor inviting you to publish a paper in their journals.

2. These journals give you a guarantee to publish your paper within a very limited time period.

3. No proper information is given on journal peer review policy.

4. No affiliations are provided for editorial board members, and sometimes editors are listed without their knowledge or permission

5. These journals may not be dedicated to one discipline, but instead publish on a wide range of subjects within one journal.

What is the solution?

As a researcher, academician or librarian you must be able to identify questionable publications.

There are guidelines, tools and services available to help you to avoid publishing with questionable  journals, and to choose a proper journal for your paper.

1 Think Check Submit

This website helps researchers to identify appropriate journals in which to publish their research.

2 Directory of Open Access Journals

DOAJ is a curated index of open access peer reviewed journals that is used by institutions all over the world as a guide to trusted journals where you can safely publish your paper.

3  Open Access Journal Platforms

Developing country authors can also choose to publish their article in journals available in aggregation platforms such as African Journals Online (AJOL), SciELO and Redalyc. Journals are evaluated according to a number of criteria regarding their publishing practices before they can be included in AJOL.

4  AuthorAID

AuthorAID is working to increase the success rate of developing country researchers in achieving publication, and to increase the visibility and influence of research in the developing world. AuthorAID achieves these objectives through networking, resources, training and mentoring. Membership is free, and you can find a mentor through the AuthorAID database or by asking the AuthorAID discussion list about experiences of particular journals.

Find a mentor to publish your research

http://www.authoraid.info/en/mentoring/

References

http://www.redalyc.org/

http://scielo.org/php/index.php?lang=en

http://www.inasp.info/en/work/authoraid/

http://www.inasp.info/en/work/journals-online/

http://thinkchecksubmit.org/

https://doaj.org/

13 thoughts on “Are you publishing in a proper journal?

  1. There is a major confusion here. Low cost journals listed as predatory have taken off and are publishing a huge number of papers. These journals have average APCs of around $100, compared to the $1500 to $3500 APCs charged by rich journals. This is a dramatic difference.

    The concept of “predatory journal” incorrectly includes a lot of legitimate low cost journals, masking a major change in scientific communication. I discuss this publishing revolution here:

    http://davidwojick.blogspot.com/2016/09/predatory-versus-low-cost.html

    India is the center of the low cost journal revolution. Research indicates that these journals are primarily serving unfunded researchers in emerging economies, who could not possibly afford to publish in rich western journals. Unfortunately the unwarranted “predatory” stigma is creating serious confusion, especially in India. I discuss this here:

    http://davidwojick.blogspot.com/2017/02/beall-based-indian-turmoil.html

    Low cost journals cannot meet the expensive criteria established for rich journals. This does not make them predatory. There are over 10,000 of these emerging journals, publishing hundreds of thousands of legitimate articles a year. They provide an important new outlet for research. We need to recognize this revolution.

    1. Reply by Vrushali Dandawate:

      First of all, I agree that the term predatory is misleading, thus DOAJ is trying to avoid using this term, we prefer to talk about questionable journals. I think the core issue is whether a journal is transparent in terms of the services the journal claims to offer to the author.

      Most authors want their work to be widely recognized, therefore journals services such as proper peer-review, check for plagiarism, archiving and indexing are important. But I realize as well that many authors only needs a reference to be put on their CV, regardless whether the work has been peer-reviewed, indexed etc. Questionable journals can provide this ”service” very cheap, but for the scholarly record those journals are not serving the author and science very well to say the least. In fact there are thousands of good journals that provides very good services cheaper than very cheap, in fact without charging at all. But of course many of those journals might not be able to provide the ”service” some authors are looking for: rapid publication, quick inclusion in their CV.

      It is important to check the journal by using some of the checklist available. I am not saying here, that if a journal is not listed in the DOAJ it is a questionable journal, but rather that if the journal is not listed, it is advisable to check the journal properly before you submit your paper.

      1. You do not seem to be recognizing the revolution. Have you read my articles? To begin with, I seriously doubt that the 500,000 or so articles per year published in these low cost journals are people “padding their resumes.” The numbers are far too large for that and I suspect that many of these legitimate articles would be rejected by the rich journals. Research suggests that this is a major outlet for unfunded researchers in emerging economies, a new channel of scientific communication for a new population of researchers.

        As for elaborate and expensive external peer review, which you apparently claim is the only “proper” form, that is questionable in this context. If a rich journal has a rejection rate of 50 to 90% then expensive 2 to 3 person external peer review might be useful. But if the rejection rate is close to 5% then it is useless and unnecessary. Editorial peer review is sufficient.

        If DOAJ wants to set standards that only rich OA journals can meet, that does not make poor journals questionable. It merely excludes them.

  2. Without wanting to start a lengthy discussion here I do feel the need to react on your latest comment
    You say
    ‘ ‘If DOAJ wants to set standards that only rich OA journals can meet, that does not make poor journals questionable. It merely excludes them.”

    You seem to asume that peer review is an expensive process but I see absolutely no evidence for this: on the contrary most peer reviewers do not get paid for their reviewing work
    I feel confident that all legitimate open access journals can meet our basic criteria for inclusion. We only exclude journals with poor publishing practices, not poor journals. And also please note that indexing and access in the DOAJ is a free service in contrast to other renowned indexing services like SCOPUS.
    I fail to see a revolution in the rise in numbers of small open access publishers. what’s more, the corresponding numbers of articles (500,000) you quote are highly questionable, please see the extensive study on this topic by Walt Crawford.(https://walt.lishost.org/2015/11/ppppredatory-article-counts-an-investigation-part-1/)
    This does not mean rhat we do not see the importance of the thousands of small open access publishers
    But the real revolution is the open access publishing system as such which allows sharing of quality research with anyone interested.as long as this quality is well checked
    Tom Olijhoek Editor in Chief DOAJ

  3. Managing extensive external peer review is probably the most expensive thing that a rich journal does, especially given a high rejection rate. This is a big reason why their APCs run to thousands of dollars.

    As for the number of articles, Crawford found about 250,000 for 2014, but later Beall’s lists are much larger. The last list (2017) had 47% more standalone journals and 25% more multi-journal publishers than the 2016 list. My 500,000 is just a guess but it could me much higher by now.

    Your list of “good practices” is actually quite expensive. Look at what a rich journal does for a $3000 APC, then ask what can be done for $100? the answer is very little besides look at the submission and post it. Your criteria are completely unrealistic for this super low cost business model. These criteria are based on rich journal practices.

  4. I agree with David. Research should be allowed to be published. We are creating a divide between funded and non funded research and this shows up in the selecion of journals.

  5. Thank you very much for providing the important information about the publishing with the correct journal. And i agree with you all fact you have shared in your blog. Everyone needs to understands about the right research paper.

  6. My own take on this is that most of these journals ask researchers to pay before they can get to be published while the established journal in most cases refuses to publish this same articles claiming backlogs or just any excuse to deny publication. My only concern is how can researchers especially those from developing countries, masters and doctoral student who are interested in putting out their research and also want to build their profiles be helped to get their articles published in standard journals and not having to pay to get published. If there are journals that can help, it would be nice to have a list of such journals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s