{"id":2309,"date":"2019-12-05T10:15:58","date_gmt":"2019-12-05T09:15:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/?p=2309"},"modified":"2019-12-05T10:15:58","modified_gmt":"2019-12-05T09:15:58","slug":"guest-post-creating-value-for-peer-review-why-not","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/2019\/12\/05\/guest-post-creating-value-for-peer-review-why-not\/","title":{"rendered":"Guest post: Creating value for peer review. Why not?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>DOAJ has approximately 100 volunteers carrying out important reviewing work for it. These volunteers come from a variety of backgrounds within academia, journal publishing or from libraries. DOAJ relies on these volunteers to keep applications flowing through the system.<\/p>\n<p>In the first of a new series, we are highlighting our volunteers&#8217; skills and interests which are connected to scholarly publishing. This is a guest post by <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/alespierno\">Alessandro Pierno<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/doaj.org\/volunteers\">DOAJ Associate Editor<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reviewercredits.com\/editorial-board\/\">Head of the Editorial Board<\/a> for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reviewercredits.com\/\">ReviewerCredits<\/a>.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<h3><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2318\" src=\"https:\/\/doajournals.files.wordpress.com\/2019\/10\/image001.png\" alt=\"image001\" width=\"100\" height=\"32\" \/>\u00a0 Creating value for peer review. Why not?<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">The peer review process is the cornerstone of scientific communication and should be considered as a key performance indicator (KPI) for scientists given the fact that, by its nature, the task demands time, knowledge and professionalism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">Still, lack of recognition for the peer reviewing work is an unsolved issue which certainly contributes to the shortage of scientists accepting the task. At the same time, with the growth of open access and the \u201c<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">pay to publish<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">\u201d model, journals need to prove the reliability and trustworthiness of their peer review process. It is clear that reviewers, journals and publishers would greatly benefit from an efficient system, rewarding reviewers and validating journals. These considerations triggered a growing interest with companies like <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/orcid.org\/\"><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">ORCID<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400;\"> and <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/publons.com\/about\/home\/\"><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">Publons<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400;\"> which started offering authors the opportunity to add reviews that they had performed to their scientific profile. Going one step further, we think that adding a tangible benefit to the peer reviewing work would represent the real game-changer in the field.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The ReviewerCredits solution<\/b><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.reviewercredits.com\"><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">ReviewerCredits.com<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400;\"> (RC) keeps a verified history of all reviews performed by each registered reviewer, and &#8211; for each verified review &#8211; assigns a number of credits, which can be used in a \u201cvirtual store\u201d representing, for the first time ever, a tangible benefit. After completing the review of a scientific paper, reviewers log in to the portal and enter a completed review claim for any journal (whether registered with RC or not). RC verifies that the review has been performed by asking a confirmation from the journal\u2019s editorial office. This step is critical in order to create a reliable and traceable history of activity performed. The review is added to the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reviewercredits.com\/benefits-for-scientists\/\"><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">scientist\u2019s personal<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400;\"> account earning a variable number of &#8220;credits&#8221;.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-2317\" src=\"https:\/\/doajournals.files.wordpress.com\/2019\/10\/reviewercredits.png\" alt=\"reviewercredits\" width=\"866\" height=\"172\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/reviewercredits.png 866w, https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/reviewercredits-300x60.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/reviewercredits-768x153.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 866px) 100vw, 866px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">Furthermore, journals using PKP\u2019s Open Journal Systems for article submission and review can now integrate a <\/span><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">free plugin<\/span><span style=\"font-weight:400;\"> which allows a direct transfer of the claim to the RC platform.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">Finally, RC has the ability to add to the author profile any talk delivered during scientific conferences, complementing the information available on the author.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What is unique in ReviewerCredits?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">There are three major assets that make ReviewerCredits really unique:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">(a) all reviews claimed must be certified by the Journal Editor and so 100% of the data are double checked and there is no room for inaccuracy or improper claims;\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">(b) performing reviews means accruing credits that can be exchanged for benefits across a number of journals and services;\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">(c) conference talks can be added to the author profile.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What are the benefits?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">The first advantage is that registered scientists will be able to <\/span><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">record<\/span><span style=\"font-weight:400;\"> in one single place all their certified reviews, as well as conference activity. A PDF certificate can be downloaded at any time and will list all the activity performed in chronological order. Additionally, as RC assigns virtual credits, they can use their credits to access selected, discounted services, specifically tailored for authors.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">Registered journals benefit from transparency and higher engagement from their reviewers. By rewarding reviewers on behalf of journals, RC creates value for the work they perform, thus helping to motivate them and contributing to reducing the burden on journal Editors. Journals can take an active part in the process supported by RC registering their journal and encouraging their peer reviewers to record their completed reviews.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">RC provides a valuable qualifier for a journal by <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reviewercredits.com\/user\/geospatial-health\/\"><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">documenting<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400;\"> that proper peer review is performed before acceptance of manuscripts. This is particularly relevant at a time when the explosive growth of low quality or questionable journals (journals who accept any manuscript, independently of their quality, for a fee and\u00a0 provide little or no peer review) is making journal selection very difficult for authors outside the top indexed journals.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">In RC the peer review activity performed by each journal is clearly visible to all and can be shared with a PDF certificate, listing all confirmed reviews performed on behalf of the journal. This is a huge asset for journals wanting to be transparent and it does not affect the confidentiality of review comments.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">In conclusion, the topic of recognition of peer review has finally reached the spotlight due to the initiatives of Orcid, Publons and others recently highlighted by <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/peerreviewweek.wordpress.com\/\"><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">Peer Review Week<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">. In this evolving scenario reviewercredits.com can contribute to creating real value for peer reviewers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b><i>About ReviewerCredits<br \/>\n<\/i><\/b><i><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">ReviewerCredits\u00a0is a spin-off company endorsed by\u00a0the University of Milan-Bicocca, launched in 2016. Its core business is the development, maintenance and upgrade of an online platform which has the purpose of\u00a0certifying peer reviews and conference talks. ReviewerCredits is listed as an innovative startup company in the\u00a0Italian company register. It was co-founded by two academic researchers, <\/span><\/i><b><i>Giacomo Bellani<\/i><\/b><i><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">, and <\/span><\/i><b><i>Robert Fruscio<\/i><\/b><i><span style=\"font-weight:400;\"> with a growing team of experts in digital entrepreneurship and STM publishing (<\/span><\/i><b><i>Veronica Mariani<\/i><\/b><i><span style=\"font-weight:400;\">, <\/span><\/i><b><i>Alessandro Pierno, Lucia Steele and Giulio Zuanetti).<\/i><\/b><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DOAJ has approximately 100 volunteers carrying out important reviewing work for it. These volunteers come from a variety of backgrounds within academia, journal publishing or from libraries. DOAJ relies on these volunteers to keep applications flowing through the system. In the first of a new series, we are highlighting our volunteers&#8217; skills and interests which&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":378,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"","_kadence_starter_templates_imported_post":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[609,615],"tags":[63,100,531,546],"class_list":["post-2309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-advice-and-best-practice","category-guest-post","tag-alessandro-pierno","tag-best-practice","tag-university-of-milan-bicocca","tag-volunteer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/378"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2309"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2309\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.doaj.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}